From the beginning you should know that the real homoeopath will never prescribe medicine only coming up from the name of disease. In fact, everybody has unique combination of physical and physical symptoms. Work of homoeopath begins, as usual, by questioning a patient, searching as many as possible details, about basic illness and concomitant, on three levels: psycho, intellect and body.
By the way, violations in a mentally-psychical sphere is often preceded and accompanied by Para functions and structure of organ. You will feel bad usually before objective information appears.  Fixing such "pre-sickly" state is really possible only on electroaccupoints diagnostics by Foll. At some level consultation can remind a psycho-analysis with that difference, that homoeopath only fixes your answers in an ambulatory card, not trying to deepen in them. Passing to anamnesis of illness, homoeopath finds out not only a hospital chart, but takes it all in a chronologic order.
On the reception large attention is paid to the individual displays, to the biorhythms - that dependence of complaints in the different day time, heat or cold, dampness, eating and etc Methods and results of the treatment used before finds out.
However to collect information is only the beginning, then a doctor must engage in the selection of preparations, often using reference book, that can demand even an hour on every reception. For homoeopathy one of the thorniest problems is in the lack of time. Even very experimental homoeopath requires heap of time for conversation with a patient, and for work with his loneliness (I.e. in surroundings of great number of the special literature). Doctors who works fast in a rapid rhythm often achieve bad results. Those, who squanders on every patient necessary time and after reception may be forced to appoint payment bigger than usual, although the patient actually saves money. Illness which homoeopath can treat really fast, in official medicine will be treated with years, only temporally muffling symptoms, on which a patient will spend much more money, not to mention about the wasted nerves and possible appearance in neglected case of irreversible pathology (including a cancer).
And if talk about narrow specialization, it is justified only in those cases, when the special inspection is required (gynecologist, ophthalmologist, oncologist). In practice a patient brings to homoeopath results, inspections and conclusion of a narrow specialist (if necessary, certainly), and homoeopath takes into account them at the selection of preparations along with other information generators (more frequent this is electroaccupoints diagnostics by Foll diagnostic which works with bioactive points on hands).
| 
